Mazda 3 2017 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda 3
2017 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 380 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds9.7 seconds
Mazda 3 2017 and Mazda 3 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 3 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.8
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1240 km on highway
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2017 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1263 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`930
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10 4007800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv