Mazda 3 2014 vs Peugeot 508 2014

 
Mazda 3
2014 - 2016
Peugeot 508
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP204 HP
Torque: 380 NM450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8.2 seconds
Peugeot 508 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 54 HP less power than Peugeot 508, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Peugeot 508. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.7
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 508, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1630 km on highway
Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)146 mm (5.7 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 508 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 6, Mazda CX-5Used also on Citroen C5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.83 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is smaller.
Mazda 3 is 25 cm shorter than the Peugeot 508, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres545 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1183 litres
Peugeot 508 has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 508.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 508, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9002`155
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 11 6008800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Peugeot 508 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv