Mazda 3 2011 vs Honda Civic 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 35 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.7 | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 440 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.56 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.16 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5000 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |