Mazda 3 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP185 HP
Torque: 360 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds8.2 seconds
Mazda 3 2009 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 2011 engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda 3 2009, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 3 2009. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2011 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.6
The Mazda 3 2011 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2011 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2011 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1170 km on highway
Mazda 3 2011 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)150 mm (5.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.46 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2011 and Mazda 3 2009 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litres1360 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9651`965
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 52004200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv