Mazda 3 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2011 and Mazda 3 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.1 | |
| Mazda 3 2011 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2011 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 119 mm (4.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2009 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 2009 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2011 and Mazda 3 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1212 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 3 has
| |