Mazda 3 2009 vs Toyota Corolla 2010

 
Mazda 3
2009 - 2010
Toyota Corolla
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Diesel (Mazda 3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Corolla) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 109 HP124 HP
Torque: 240 NM157 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.4 seconds
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 15 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, but torque is 83 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.56.9
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1440 km on highway940 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest. The timing chain has a ...  More about Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.54 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres450 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`785
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 32004800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv