Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 6 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 167 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 228 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 seconds | |
Mazda 3 engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 3 is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 519 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 184 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |