Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2009 engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 3 2011, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 3 2011. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Mazda 3 2009 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2009 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |