Mazda 3 2009 vs Seat Leon 2009

 
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Seat Leon
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 185 HP170 HP
Torque: 400 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds8.2 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Leon, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Seat Leon.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.3
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1240 km on highway
Seat Leon gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.32 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is 15 cm longer than the Seat Leon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres341 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litresno data
Mazda 3 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Seat Leon.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Leon.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9651`890
Safety:
Seat Leon scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
high

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42004200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Seat Leon has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv