Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 6 2009
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 22 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1170 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 3 is 25 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 1751 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 165 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 391 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`135 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |