Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.2 | |
| Mazda 3 2009 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2011, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 119 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2009 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 2009 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 1212 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |