Mazda 3 2019 vs Renault Megane 2021
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Megane, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 3 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1138 litres | 987 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 151 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`894 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |