Mazda 3 2019 vs BMW 3 series 2018

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
BMW 3 series
2018 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 186 HP258 HP
Torque: 252 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds5.8 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 72 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 148 NM less than BMW 3 series.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.1
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres59 litres
820 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km320'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 6 sērija, BMW Z4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.71 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres480 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`060
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 14 80036 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv