Mazda 3 2019 vs BMW 3 series 2018

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
BMW 3 series
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 186 HP382 HP
Torque: 252 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 196 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 248 NM less than BMW 3 series.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.89.4
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway750 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda CX-5Used also on BMW X4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.
BMW 3 sērija 2018 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.71 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 450 litresno data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 16 60031 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv