Mazda 3 2019 vs Tesla Model 3 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 5.6 seconds | |
|
Tesla Model 3 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 203 HP less power than Tesla Model 3, whereas torque is 207 NM less than Tesla Model 3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | ||
| Range per fill-up: | 920 km in combined cycle | 409 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Tesla Model 3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller. Mazda 3 is 3 cm shorter than the Tesla Model 3, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 425 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Tesla Model 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`902 kg | 2`060 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`383 kg | 1`609 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 519 kg | 451 kg | |
| Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Tesla Model 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Tesla Model 3 has
| |