Mazda 3 2019 vs Jaguar XE 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 178 HP less power than Jaguar XE, whereas torque is 187 NM less than Jaguar XE. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 3 is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar XE, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 410 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 3 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XE. The Jaguar XE may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`902 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |