Mazda 3 2019 vs Skoda Scala 2023

 
Mazda 3
2019 - 2021
Skoda Scala
2023 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP150 HP
Torque: 213 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds8.2 seconds
Skoda Scala is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Scala, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Skoda Scala. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.6
Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.36 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.44 m1.51 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Scala, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres467 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1019 litres1410 litres
Skoda Scala has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Scala (by 391 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Scala, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`907 kg1`700 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 21 20018 800
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Scala has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv