Mazda 3 2019 vs Skoda Octavia 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 6 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, but torque is 7 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Despite the higher power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller. Mazda 3 is 25 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1019 litres | 1555 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 270 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 536 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`907 kg | 1`930 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |