Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Mazda 3 2016 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2019 engine produces 43 HP less power than Mazda 3 2016, but torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 3 2016. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
The Mazda 3 2019 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2019 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Mazda 3 2019 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | 1334 litres | |
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage space. Mazda 3 2019 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2016 (by 315 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`907 | 1`815 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 21 200 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |