Mazda 3 2019 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 8 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 53 NM more than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 15 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`907 | 1`181 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Ceed has
| |