Mazda 3 2019 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 18 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1019 litres | 1301 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`907 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`389 kg | 1`240 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 518 kg | 610 kg | |
| Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Hyundai i30. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |