Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Mazda 3
2019 - 2021
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP120 HP
Torque: 213 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda 3 2019 engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 3 2016, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 3 2016. Despite the higher power, Mazda 3 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.1
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1180 km on highway
790 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1019 litres1263 litres
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 2019 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2016 (by 244 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight: 1`875 kg1`815 kg
Net weight:1`364 kg1`205 kg
Load capacity:511 kg610 kg
Mazda 3 2019 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Mazda 3 2016. Therefore, Mazda 3 2016 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 21 2009800
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv