Mazda 3 2019 vs Audi A3 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 and Audi A3 have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 torque is 37 NM less than Audi A3. Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1019 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 181 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`907 kg | 1`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`299 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 608 kg | 550 kg | |
| Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Audi A3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 28 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |