Mazda 3 2019 vs Peugeot 308 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda 3) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Peugeot 308) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 308 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 31 HP less power than Peugeot 308, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Peugeot 308. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 1.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 13.00 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 3070 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Mazda 3 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 308, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1019 litres | 1271 litres | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 308 (by 252 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 308. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`907 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`299 kg | 1`633 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 608 kg | 487 kg | |
| Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Peugeot 308. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Peugeot 308 has
| |