Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2019 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 3 2016, but torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 3 2016. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2019 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2019 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2016 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 2016 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1019 litres | 1334 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage space. Mazda 3 2019 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2016 (by 315 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`907 kg | 1`815 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`299 kg | 1`334 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 608 kg | 481 kg | |
| Mazda 3 2019 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Mazda 3 2016. Therefore, Mazda 3 2019 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |