Mazda 3 2019 vs Volkswagen Golf 2024

 
Mazda 3
2019 - 2021
Volkswagen Golf
2024 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP150 HP
Torque: 270 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds8 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 34 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.14.7
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.30 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres381 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1019 litres1237 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 218 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`898 kg1`940 kg
Net weight:1`385 kg1`369 kg
Load capacity:513 kg571 kg
Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Volkswagen Golf. Therefore, Volkswagen Golf is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 21 60032 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv