Mazda 3 2019 vs Opel Astra 2015

 
Mazda 3
2019 - 2021
Opel Astra
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP110 HP
Torque: 270 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 6 HP more power than Opel Astra, but torque is 30 NM less than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.13.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1290 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1450 km on highway
940 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.49 m
Mazda 3 is 9 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1019 litres1210 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 191 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`898 kg1`870 kg
Net weight:1`385 kg1`289 kg
Load capacity:513 kg581 kg
Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Opel Astra. Therefore, Opel Astra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 21 2006800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv