Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2019 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 2019 engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda 3 2016, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2019 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 2016 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | 1263 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage space. Mazda 3 2019 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2016 (by 244 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`898 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |