Mazda 3 2019 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 4 HP less power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Fiat Tipo. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower. Mazda 3 is 9 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`898 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |