Mazda 3 2019 vs Toyota Auris 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 132 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.6 | |
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 19 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | no data | |
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`830 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 21 000 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Auris has
| |