Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 2019 and Mazda 3 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 3 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 2019 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2019 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 2019 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage space. Mazda 3 2019 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 3 has
| |