Mazda 3 2019 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 62 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 9 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 481 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |