Mazda 3 2016 vs Hyundai Elantra 2016

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Hyundai Elantra
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP149 HP
Torque: 380 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds8.8 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 1 HP more power than Hyundai Elantra, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Hyundai Elantra. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.97.1
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1300 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway890 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)135 mm (5.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 6, Mazda CX-5Used also on Hyundai Kona
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.57 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres458 litres
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9101`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 13 400no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Hyundai Elantra has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv