Mazda 3 2016 vs Hyundai Elantra 2016

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Hyundai Elantra
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 105 HP128 HP
Torque: 270 NM155 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.1 seconds
Hyundai Elantra is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 23 HP less power than Hyundai Elantra, but torque is 115 NM more than Hyundai Elantra. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.86.6
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1340 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway960 km on highway
980 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years18 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 2Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.57 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres458 litres
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 13 400no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Hyundai Elantra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv