Mazda 3 2016 vs Jaguar XE 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 75 HP less power than Jaguar XE, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Jaguar XE. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 56 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 2 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 3 is 9 cm shorter than the Jaguar XE, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XE has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar XE, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |
