Mazda 3 2016 vs Subaru Impreza 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 268 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Subaru Impreza is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 148 HP less power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Subaru Impreza. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.6 | |
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 460 litres | |
Subaru Impreza has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 41 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 31 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |