Mazda 3 2016 vs Ford Focus 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Focus, but torque is 8 NM more than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 372 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |