Mazda 3 2016 vs Ford Focus 2014

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP95 HP
Torque: 210 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds12.1 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford Focus, but torque is 60 NM less than Ford Focus. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.63.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1390 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1550 km on highway
720 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.53 m
Width: 1.78 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Mazda 3 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres374 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 13 4008000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Ford Focus has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv