Mazda 3 2016 vs Ford Focus 2014

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP100 HP
Torque: 210 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds12.6 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Focus. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.69.8
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway980 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.53 m
Width: 1.78 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Mazda 3 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres374 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 12 2008200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Ford Focus has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv