Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2016 engine produces 45 HP less power than Mazda 3 2016, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.8 | |
| Mazda 3 2016 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 2016 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2016, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1334 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 2016 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |