Mazda 3 2016 vs Opel Astra 2015

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Opel Astra
2015 - 2018
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP150 HP
Torque: 150 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.3 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 50 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Opel Astra.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.5
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres48 litres
790 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.37 m
Width: 1.78 m1.81 m
Height: 1.45 m1.49 m
Mazda 3 is 21 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1210 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 49 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 13 4009000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv