Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 100 HP100 HP
Torque: 150 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.1
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
790 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 2016 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2016, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 2016 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 13 40010 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv