Mazda 3 2016 vs Nissan Sentra 2016

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Nissan Sentra
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 104 HP124 HP
Torque: 144 NM169 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Sentra, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Nissan Sentra.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.37.3
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Sentra, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway790 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)166 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Sentra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Sentra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.64 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Mazda 3 is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Sentra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 408 litres428 litres
Mazda 3 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Sentra.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`758
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 11 200no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Nissan Sentra has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv