Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 104 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2016 engine produces 16 HP less power than Mazda 3 2016, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 3 2016. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2016 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2016 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 3 2016 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 2016 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 2016 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |