Mazda 3 2016 vs Ford Focus 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 169 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 374 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 3 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The Ford Focus may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |