Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP120 HP
Torque: 150 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds11.9 seconds
Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.8
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway1040 km on highway
720 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 2016 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 408 litres364 litres
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 2016 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`835
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 13 40010 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv