Mazda 3 2016 vs Ford Focus 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 and Ford Focus have the same engine power, but Mazda 3 torque is 10 NM more than Ford Focus. Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 47 litres | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 9 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1354 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 91 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |