Mazda 3 2016 vs Nissan Leaf 2017

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Nissan Leaf
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 DieselElectric

Performance

Power: 105 HP150 HP
Torque: 270 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds7.9 seconds
Nissan Leaf is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 45 HP less power than Nissan Leaf, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Leaf. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Consumption: 4.4 l/100km20.6 kWh/100km
Fuel cost per 100km: 7.90 $ at$/l 6.90 $ at$/kWh
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country.
Range per fill-up: 1150 km in combined cycle324 km in combined cycle
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.48 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.54 m
Mazda 3 is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Leaf, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1161 litres
Mazda 3 has 71 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Leaf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 102 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Leaf, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`995
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 10 40016 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more mileage per fill-up
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Nissan Leaf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv