Mazda 3 2016 vs Nissan Leaf 2017
Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Nissan Leaf is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 45 HP less power than Nissan Leaf, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Leaf. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Consumption: | 4.4 l/100km | 20.6 kWh/100km | |
Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.90 $ at$/l | 6.90 $ at$/kWh | |
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. | |||
Range per fill-up: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 324 km in combined cycle | |
Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.54 m | |
Mazda 3 is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Leaf, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 435 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1161 litres | |
Mazda 3 has 71 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Leaf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 102 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Leaf, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`995 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 16 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Nissan Leaf has
| |