Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 105 HP120 HP
Torque: 270 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds11.7 seconds
Mazda 3 2016 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 3 2013, but torque is 120 NM more than Mazda 3 2013. Despite less power, Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.45.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 2016 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 2016 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
770 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years11 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 2Used also on Mazda 2
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1263 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`900no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10 4007800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv