Mazda 3 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 2016 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 3 2013, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.6
6.2
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2016 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:
51 litres
51 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
910 km in combined cycle
820 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway
860 km on highway
Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance:
155 mm (6.1 inches)
155 mm (6.1 inches)
Dimensions
Length:
4.47 m
4.47 m
Width:
1.80 m
1.80 m
Height:
1.45 m
1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length.
